AI GO Logo
AI GO
By function

AI for Research

Thirty sources read to produce a one-page brief — and the invisible middle part takes the longest. AI GO puts source extraction, grounded question-answering and summarisation in one workspace so researchers spend their time on judgement.

Multi-source
web and text extracted in one pass
Cited
RAG answers trace back to the passage
Cumulative
findings stay with the org, not a personal drive

What you are probably dealing with

Sources are read and then scattered

Dozens of sources go into one report, with the key points copied into a personal notes app. Three months later a colleague covering similar ground has to read it all again.

Citations cannot be traced

The report is written and now needs sources attributed — which means hunting for one sentence across dozens of PDFs. When it cannot be found, the claim gets softened and the report loses credibility.

AI summaries you dare not use

A general-purpose assistant summarises quickly, but you cannot see which passage it drew on or whether it invented anything. Verifying takes longer than reading would have.

Research assets belong to individuals

Curated knowledge lives on one person’s cloud drive. When they move on, three years of accumulated context moves with them.

Before and after

Before

  1. 1Sources opened one by one, points copied into notes
  2. 2Cross-document comparison done from memory and search
  3. 3Citations hunted down while writing
  4. 4Summaries drafted by a general AI but not trusted for quoting
  5. 5Output stored on a personal cloud drive

With AI GO

  1. 1Sources imported in bulk and extracted automatically
  2. 2Questions asked across the whole set, answers carry citations
  3. 3Citations trace back to the original passage
  4. 4Summaries and mind maps generated from the sources
  5. 5The research workspace lives under the company account

Modules involved

The research assistant is the core. Teams with legal or patent needs can add the judgment and patent modules.

智能筆記 · AI 研究與筆記助理

AI 驅動的多來源研究助理。支援網頁/文字來源萃取、RAG 引用問答、摘要報告、心智圖、雙主持人對談與學習卡生成。

Productivity

專利事務所案件總管理系統

中小型專利商標事務所的案件總管理系統:案件卷宗、法定期限 Docketing、年費維護、收發文日誌、工時計費與請款收款一站完成。零自訂資料表,全部落在 AI GO 內建的專案、客戶、人資與會計表上。

Operations

通用 · 專案管理中心

以 AI GO 內建專案模組為核心的專案全生命週期管理後台:專案組合儀表板、任務看板與工時、里程碑、專案週報、費用請款簽核、預算與實際收支分析、會議記錄。

Productivity

Platform capabilities

Grounded answers, not invention

Web and text sources are extracted and queried via RAG, with answers tracing back to the source passage. You never get a fluent claim you cannot substantiate.

From sources to output in one place

Summary reports, mind maps and deep-dive conversations all happen in the same workspace — no shuttling material between four tools.

Findings become organisational assets

The workspace sits under the company account rather than a personal drive. When people move on the context stays, and whoever picks it up can see how it was built.

Control over sensitive material

Who can see which sources and who exported what are scoped and logged, so internal unpublished material does not have to leave in order to be useful.

Labour cost you can recover

For a three-person research or strategy team at an average loaded rate of NT$450/hour:

Reading sources and extracting key points

Hours / month
40 hrs
Hourly rate
NT$ 450
Recovered / month
NT$ 18,000

Cross-document comparison and verification

Hours / month
24 hrs
Hourly rate
NT$ 500
Recovered / month
NT$ 12,000

Tracing citations back to source

Hours / month
14 hrs
Hourly rate
NT$ 420
Recovered / month
NT$ 5,880

Report formatting and chart preparation

Hours / month
16 hrs
Hourly rate
NT$ 380
Recovered / month
NT$ 6,080
TotalNT$ 41,960

These figures assume a typical staffing profile. Real numbers depend on your team size and process — we rerun the model with your own data during a consult.

FAQ

How is this different from just using ChatGPT?
Sourcing and ownership. A general chat tool cannot reliably trace answers back to your own material, and nothing it produces stays with the organisation. Here, answers are grounded in the sources you imported, carry citations, and the workspace belongs to the company rather than an individual.
Can AI summaries be wrong?
Yes — any AI can be. What matters is how fast you can check. Because answers trace to the original passage, verification is a click rather than a re-read. Treating AI as a way to locate faster rather than to decide for you is the correct use of this class of tool.
Can we put confidential internal material in?
Access control and audit are handled at the platform layer: who can see which sources and who exported what are logged. Deployment shape can also be discussed against your security requirements.
Who are the judgment and patent modules for?
Judicial judgment search suits teams with compliance or litigation research needs; the patent management system is for IP firms or in-house IP units managing cases and deadlines. General research teams only need the research assistant.

Further reading

Other solutions

Want to see this run on your own process?

Leave your details and an FDE will walk it through with your data.