AI GO Logo
AI GO
By function

AI for Research

Thirty sources read to produce a one-page brief — and the invisible middle part takes the longest. AI GO puts source extraction, grounded question-answering and summarisation in one workspace so researchers spend their time on judgement.

Multi-source
web and text extracted in one pass
Cited
RAG answers trace back to the passage
Cumulative
findings stay with the org, not a personal drive

What you are probably dealing with

Sources are read and then scattered

Dozens of sources go into one report, with the key points copied into a personal notes app. Three months later a colleague covering similar ground has to read it all again.

Citations cannot be traced

The report is written and now needs sources attributed — which means hunting for one sentence across dozens of PDFs. When it cannot be found, the claim gets softened and the report loses credibility.

AI summaries you dare not use

A general-purpose assistant summarises quickly, but you cannot see which passage it drew on or whether it invented anything. Verifying takes longer than reading would have.

Research assets belong to individuals

Curated knowledge lives on one person’s cloud drive. When they move on, three years of accumulated context moves with them.

Before and after

Before

  1. 1Sources opened one by one, points copied into notes
  2. 2Cross-document comparison done from memory and search
  3. 3Citations hunted down while writing
  4. 4Summaries drafted by a general AI but not trusted for quoting
  5. 5Output stored on a personal cloud drive

With AI GO

  1. 1Sources imported in bulk and extracted automatically
  2. 2Questions asked across the whole set, answers carry citations
  3. 3Citations trace back to the original passage
  4. 4Summaries and mind maps generated from the sources
  5. 5The research workspace lives under the company account

Modules involved

The research assistant is the core. Teams with legal or patent needs can add the judgment and patent modules.

筆記與思考研究助手

AI 驅動的多來源研究助手。支援網頁/文字來源萃取、RAG 問答、摘要報告、心智圖與 Deep Dive 對話生成。

Productivity

司法院裁判書

整合司法院資料開放平臺 API,查詢裁判書內容、追蹤異動清單、依法院分類瀏覽,提供法律研究與案件分析支援。

Analytics

事務所專利管理系統

為專利商標事務所設計的案件管理系統。含營運儀表板、案件看板、專利商標案件全生命週期管理,並整合 OCR 公文建檔、AI 說明書輔助、OA 答辯與里程碑計費等後端 Action。

Operations

專案管理中心

專案全生命週期管理中心:專案預算收支、請款簽核流程、任務進度追蹤與回報、會議記錄管理。內建預算執行率分析、請款狀態機簽核與結案檢查。

Productivity

Platform capabilities

Grounded answers, not invention

Web and text sources are extracted and queried via RAG, with answers tracing back to the source passage. You never get a fluent claim you cannot substantiate.

From sources to output in one place

Summary reports, mind maps and deep-dive conversations all happen in the same workspace — no shuttling material between four tools.

Findings become organisational assets

The workspace sits under the company account rather than a personal drive. When people move on the context stays, and whoever picks it up can see how it was built.

Control over sensitive material

Who can see which sources and who exported what are scoped and logged, so internal unpublished material does not have to leave in order to be useful.

Labour cost you can recover

For a three-person research or strategy team at an average loaded rate of NT$450/hour:

Reading sources and extracting key points

Hours / month
40 hrs
Hourly rate
NT$ 450
Recovered / month
NT$ 18,000

Cross-document comparison and verification

Hours / month
24 hrs
Hourly rate
NT$ 500
Recovered / month
NT$ 12,000

Tracing citations back to source

Hours / month
14 hrs
Hourly rate
NT$ 420
Recovered / month
NT$ 5,880

Report formatting and chart preparation

Hours / month
16 hrs
Hourly rate
NT$ 380
Recovered / month
NT$ 6,080
TotalNT$ 41,960

These figures assume a typical staffing profile. Real numbers depend on your team size and process — we rerun the model with your own data during a consult.

FAQ

How is this different from just using ChatGPT?
Sourcing and ownership. A general chat tool cannot reliably trace answers back to your own material, and nothing it produces stays with the organisation. Here, answers are grounded in the sources you imported, carry citations, and the workspace belongs to the company rather than an individual.
Can AI summaries be wrong?
Yes — any AI can be. What matters is how fast you can check. Because answers trace to the original passage, verification is a click rather than a re-read. Treating AI as a way to locate faster rather than to decide for you is the correct use of this class of tool.
Can we put confidential internal material in?
Access control and audit are handled at the platform layer: who can see which sources and who exported what are logged. Deployment shape can also be discussed against your security requirements.
Who are the judgment and patent modules for?
Judicial judgment search suits teams with compliance or litigation research needs; the patent management system is for IP firms or in-house IP units managing cases and deadlines. General research teams only need the research assistant.

Further reading

Other solutions

Want to see this run on your own process?

Leave your details and an FDE will walk it through with your data.