---
title: "AI for Research | Multi-source Synthesis, RAG Q&A and Report Generation - AI GO"
description: "Bring source extraction, cited question-answering and summary reports into one workspace. AI GO provides a research assistant, judicial judgment search and patent management — with findings staying in the organisation rather than a personal drive."
keywords: "research AI, RAG, knowledge management, report generation, literature review, AI GO"
canonical: "https://www.ai-go.app/en-US/solutions/research"
locale: "en-US"
source: "AI GO（https://www.ai-go.app）"
---

# AI for Research

Thirty sources read to produce a one-page brief — and the invisible middle part takes the longest. AI GO puts source extraction, grounded question-answering and summarisation in one workspace so researchers spend their time on judgement.

- **Multi-source** web and text extracted in one pass
- **Cited** RAG answers trace back to the passage
- **Cumulative** findings stay with the org, not a personal drive

## 現況痛點

### Sources are read and then scattered

Dozens of sources go into one report, with the key points copied into a personal notes app. Three months later a colleague covering similar ground has to read it all again.

### Citations cannot be traced

The report is written and now needs sources attributed — which means hunting for one sentence across dozens of PDFs. When it cannot be found, the claim gets softened and the report loses credibility.

### AI summaries you dare not use

A general-purpose assistant summarises quickly, but you cannot see which passage it drew on or whether it invented anything. Verifying takes longer than reading would have.

### Research assets belong to individuals

Curated knowledge lives on one person’s cloud drive. When they move on, three years of accumulated context moves with them.

## 導入前後對照

**Before**

- Sources opened one by one, points copied into notes
- Cross-document comparison done from memory and search
- Citations hunted down while writing
- Summaries drafted by a general AI but not trusted for quoting
- Output stored on a personal cloud drive

**With AI GO**

- Sources imported in bulk and extracted automatically
- Questions asked across the whole set, answers carry citations
- Citations trace back to the original passage
- Summaries and mind maps generated from the sources
- The research workspace lives under the company account

## AI GO 對應能力

The research assistant is the core. Teams with legal or patent needs can add the judgment and patent modules.

### Grounded answers, not invention

Web and text sources are extracted and queried via RAG, with answers tracing back to the source passage. You never get a fluent claim you cannot substantiate.

### From sources to output in one place

Summary reports, mind maps and deep-dive conversations all happen in the same workspace — no shuttling material between four tools.

### Findings become organisational assets

The workspace sits under the company account rather than a personal drive. When people move on the context stays, and whoever picks it up can see how it was built.

### Control over sensitive material

Who can see which sources and who exported what are scoped and logged, so internal unpublished material does not have to leave in order to be useful.

## ROI 試算

For a three-person research or strategy team at an average loaded rate of NT$450/hour:

| 作業項目 | 每月人工工時 | 時薪 | 每月可省 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reading sources and extracting key points | 40 | NT$450 | NT$18,000 |
| Cross-document comparison and verification | 24 | NT$500 | NT$12,000 |
| Tracing citations back to source | 14 | NT$420 | NT$5,880 |
| Report formatting and chart preparation | 16 | NT$380 | NT$6,080 |

## 常見問題

### How is this different from just using ChatGPT?

Sourcing and ownership. A general chat tool cannot reliably trace answers back to your own material, and nothing it produces stays with the organisation. Here, answers are grounded in the sources you imported, carry citations, and the workspace belongs to the company rather than an individual.

### Can AI summaries be wrong?

Yes — any AI can be. What matters is how fast you can check. Because answers trace to the original passage, verification is a click rather than a re-read. Treating AI as a way to locate faster rather than to decide for you is the correct use of this class of tool.

### Can we put confidential internal material in?

Access control and audit are handled at the platform layer: who can see which sources and who exported what are logged. Deployment shape can also be discussed against your security requirements.

### Who are the judgment and patent modules for?

Judicial judgment search suits teams with compliance or litigation research needs; the patent management system is for IP firms or in-house IP units managing cases and deadlines. General research teams only need the research assistant.